If you ignore it: what happens after a TCPA demand letter deadline passes
Ignoring a TCPA demand letter means the deadline passes with no reply. The letter does not expire. The person who received the calls still holds a claim worth $500 per call, up to $1,500 if willful, for four years from the call. What changes is who is handling it and what the next document looks like. Here is the sequence, and the one situation where ignoring is the correct choice.
The one case where ignoring is right
A genuine fraud. The signs: no identifiable entity, or one that does not appear in any state registry. No specific calls listed, just a general accusation. A demand for payment by gift card, cryptocurrency or wire to a personal account. Pressure to pay today by phone. A letter like that is not a claim, and the right response is to keep it, report it, and move on.
A letter that lists real calls to real numbers on real dates, from an entity you can find in a registry with a working website and a matter reference, is not that letter. Ignoring it is a bet that the sender will not follow through.
What happens after the deadline
- The deadline passes. The sender notes that no response was received. Some send a second notice with a shorter date. Some do not.
- Referral. An enforcement firm that does not itself file refers the matter to litigation counsel who do. The file they hand over includes the letter and the fact that it went unanswered.
- The complaint. Counsel files in federal or state court. The complaint pleads every call the evidence supports and seeks statutory damages on each.
- Service. A process server delivers the summons and complaint to your registered agent or your premises. From that date a court deadline runs for your answer. Its length varies by court. It is short, and it is not negotiable the way the letter's date was.
- If you ignore that too: default judgment. The court enters judgment for the amount pleaded without hearing your side. A default judgment is a public record and collectable against business assets.
- If you answer: discovery. The whole calling programme, not the listed calls, becomes the subject.
What ignoring does to the number
Two things. First, the letter is notice. A court deciding whether violations were willful or knowing can consider that the business was told in writing and did nothing. That is the difference between $500 and $1,500 per call. Second, the discount disappears. The letter's figure was an offer to resolve documented calls for less than their statutory value. Once a complaint is filed, the number in play is the statutory value of every call discovery finds, plus the cost of defending it.
The quiet costs
- Insurance. Many general liability policies exclude TCPA claims. Check yours now rather than after service, and if there is any chance of cover, notify the insurer while the matter is still a letter.
- Reputation. A letter is private. A filed complaint is a docket entry with your business name on it, findable by anyone who searches.
- Personal exposure. The entity does not always shield the person who directed the calls. That question is for your lawyer, and it is a reason not to let a letter become a judgment.
- Time. A letter takes an afternoon. A lawsuit takes months.
If the deadline has already passed
Reply anyway. A late response that engages with the claim is better than none. Say you are responding late, say what you are doing about it, and ask whether the matter is still open for resolution. Most senders would rather settle than refer. Then pick a path: pay or dispute.
Questions people ask at this point
They send thousands of these. They cannot sue everyone.
They do not need to. They need to sue enough, and the businesses that ignored the letter are the easiest cases to bring, because the evidence is already assembled and the notice is on file.
How long after the deadline until a lawsuit?
There is no fixed interval. Referral can take weeks or months. The claim stays live for four years from the call, so silence is not evidence that it went away.
Can I ignore the letter but stop calling?
Stopping is right on any path. It prevents new violations. The ones in the letter are still owed.
We never received a second notice. Does that matter?
There is no requirement for one. The first letter was the notice.